Two Forms of Explanations in Computational Assumption-based Argumentation

نویسندگان

  • Xiuyi Fan
  • Siyuan Liu
  • Huiguo Zhang
  • Chunyan Miao
  • Cyril Leung
چکیده

Computational Assumption-based Argumentation (CABA) has been introduced to model argumentation with numerical data processing. To realize the “explanation power” of CABA, we study two forms of argumentative explanations, argument explanations and CU explanations representing diagnosis and repair, resp.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

On Computing Explanations in Argumentation

Argumentation can be viewed as a process of generating explanations. However, existing argumentation semantics are developed for identifying acceptable arguments within a set, rather than giving concrete justifications for them. In this work, we propose a new argumentation semantics, related admissibility, designed for giving explanations to arguments in both Abstract Argumentation and Assumpti...

متن کامل

Explained Activity Recognition with Computational Assumption-Based Argumentation

Activity recognition is a key problem in multi-sensor systems. In this work, we introduce Computational Assumption-based Argumentation, an argumentation approach that seamlessly combines sensor data processing with high-level inference. Our method gives classification results comparable to machine learning based approaches with reduced training time while also giving explanations.

متن کامل

EWG-DSS Thessaloniki-2013 EURO Working Group on Decision Support Systems Workshop on “Exploring New Directions for Decisions in the Internet Age”

In this talk I will provide an overview of Computational Argumentation, focusing on two wellknown and widely used approaches, namely abstract argumentation and assumption-based argumentation, and their possible uses in Web contexts, and in particular the Semantic Web and Social Networks. For both forms of Computational Argumentation, I will outline potential extensions required to meet the chal...

متن کامل

Assumption-Based Argumentation for Closed and Consistent Defeasible Reasoning

Assumption-based argumentation is a concrete but generalpurpose argumentation framework that has been shown, in particular, to generalise several existing mechanisms for non-monotonic reasoning, and is equipped with a computational counterpart and an implemented system. It can thus serve as a computational tool for argumentation-based reasoning, and for automatising the process of nding solutio...

متن کامل

Reasoning on the Web with Assumption-Based Argumentation

This tutorial provides an overview of computational argumentation, focusing on abstract argumentation and assumption-based argumentation, how they relate, as well as possible uses of the latter in Web contexts, and in particular the Semantic Web and Social Networks. The tutorial outlines achievements to date as well as (some) open issues.

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017